The Free State
"Man, in a word, has no nature. What he has is - history."

Thursday, July 26, 2007

The Pain Cartoons

Tim Kreider is a genius. That is why own his two books full of his cartoons. He is insecure, moody, nihilistic, sexually frustrated, and depressed, but armed with a sharp intelligence, vicious sarcasm and a keen eye for hypocrisy.

Some of his most recent cartoons I think are so good I had to share:

Always posts his cartoons with an "Artist's Statement", usually with some witty references, in depth analysis of the cartoon or his current gripe. For this cartoon he writes hilariously about the odd pathology of being raised during the Cold War, when the END OF THE WORLD would be in mushroom clouds, not rising oceans. Sugary excerpt:

Plus think of all the great art and pop culture about Cold War espionage and apocalypse: John Le Carré! James Bond! Dr. Strangelove! Not to mention the very large radioactive monsters we had back in those days. Military nuts and novelists used to fantasize about the totally excellent Third World War we could have with our new generation of kick-ass conventional weapons if only the Soviets would invade Western Europe. But the treacherous bastards never did, and this left our military/industrial complex frustrated as though with a fifty-year case of the blueballs. America still approaches every conflict as though it were that one, the Big One, W.W. Three, "toe-to-toe with the Russkies," sending in aircraft carriers and bringing on the heavy tanks and cruise missiles and radar-invisible bombers by the thousands, even if it’s a guerilla insurgency in a small town in the desert.
You can read the rest (on why the Soviets were so much cooler, worthier foes than Al Qaeda, or how Putin is a real-life James Bond villain) here.

Here's another recent good one:

My favorite, definitely, is the last panel. Beautiful.

You can read his (more or less) weekly cartoons here, as well as the archives.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Book Review: Francois Mitterrand

I've been reading lots of books this summer. The blog is looking arid. 2 n 2...

First up is "Francois Mitterrand: The Last French President" by Ronald Tiersky. In it Tiersky covers the life, achievements and personality of France's deceased Socialist president. The book is not exactly a traditional biography, for one it's non-linear, describing events in his life by theme rather than chronologically.

Tiersky describes Mitterrand's major efforts to "make History" in three broad themes. The first is the attempt at "socialism" from 1981 to 1983, the massive budget deficits, the trade deficits and coming financial collapse. In switching to fiscal discipline, in the name of "Europe" because it allowed France to stay in the European Monetary System, Mitterrand's failed attempt in fact spelled the death of "socialism". Many other leftist parties in Europe would learn from Mitterrand's experiment to not go too crazy upon taking over the state.

The second was "Europe". "Europe! Europe! Europe!" The common market, the Euro, the Maastricht Treaty ("ever closer union") and all that shazzle. Europe was Mitterrand's greatest divergence de Gaulle's strict nation-statism and was his answer to the end of the Cold War and German unification.

The third was, rather inelegantly titled by Tiersky, "legitimacy and institutions". It's an important theme though, that with Mitterrand, the left fully reconciled itself to the Fifth republic. Mitterrand accomplished this by embracing the symbols of the fifth republic, building monuments as a socialist president, interring left-wing heroes, not screwing the cohabitation too much etc.

The accomplishments are real, as are the failures (notably France's notoriously high unemployment, which began under Mitterrand), but the parts I found most interesting were those which dealt with Mitterrand's personality and private life. Stories, like how a smitten 22-year old Mitterrand, later a notorious womanizer, became engaged to a 15 year old, and then was sent to war. He was captured by the Germans, escaped after 18 months only to find his belle had found someone else, leaving him truly heartbroken (he doesn't seemed to have loved anyone else in the same way, for fear of vulnerability?). Or how Mitterrand, once de Gaulle and the right asssumed power in 1958, spent twenty-three years in opposition before coming to power in 1981. If that isn't a mark of dedication...

Also of interest is Mitterrand' outlook on life. Tiersky labels him an existentialist, an agnostic and skeptic, but who willed meaning and life from the consciousness we are given. Mitterrand was shy, timid, (though he made it come across as haughty or mysterious) he had to make a conscious effort to overcome it. That was freedom to Mitterrand, something that had more to do with overcoming oneself than anything outside us. He believed most people incapable of that kind of freedom, he wrote about being held prisoner in 1940 with his fellow French soldiers:
I was really astonished at the ease with which men accustom themselves to the life of a herd of sheep. And these were the same men who, nourished by ideas of liberty and progress had vaunted so much and so proudly their nature as individuals...But I observed yet one more time that the play rarely touches its actors, that people are much like straw when faced with unhappiness or happiness; the greatest happiness gives man migraine; the greatest unhappiness gets to him only through the small things that are lacking in a meal, or bread which gets tale.
Tiersky generally writes positively about Mitterrand, but he doesn't leave out the innumerable scandals and moral failures: his "three wives and two families", the Rainbow Warrior incident (led to the death of one photographer), lying about his cancer, changing France's electoral system to the benefit of the Front National, his defense of ex-Vichy officials who had sent Jews in France to Nazi death camps. Tiersky leaves everything needed for a judgment of this "Last French President". The last one live "the French exception" of an unreconstructed and idealist Left, of an uber-powerful presidency at home, of French power in Africa, of a France standing as a nuclear third pole between the superpowers. Mitterrand said, presidents after him "will only be accountants"... Chirac, and this isn't a criticism, was less than interesting. Lets see how Sarko fairs.